Dunning v. Crane
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from a decree advised by Vice-Chancellor Pitney, whose opinion in Newark City National Bank v. Crane, reported in 15 Dick. Ch. Rep. 121, controls this case. See, also, Crane v. Bolles, 1/. Dick. Ch. Rep. S7S.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Van Syckel, J.
This bill is filed by the children of Thomas N. Bolles, deceased, to compel Crane, the surviving executor of Nathan Bolles, deceased, to pay them such sums of money as have become due to them since the death of said Thomas N. Bolles under the will of said Nathan Bolles.
On the 24th of April, 1889, the executors of Nathan Bolles, deceased, filed a bill in chancery for the construction of the will of the said testator.
To this bill Thomas N. Bolles and all other persons who, at the time of filing the bill, had any interest in the estate of…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Reibesehl v. ReibesehlNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
- Sorg v. TowerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
- In Re KilloughNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1935