Legal Opinion
Reibesehl v. Reibesehl
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided April 11, 1930PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This case arose upon a petition filed November 21st, 1926, for divorce. The defendant did not answer and the cause was referred to a special master, to report upon the propriety of granting the relief prayed for. The report was filed July 9th, 1927, and recommended a divorce.
The master examined the petitioner as follows:
"Q. Did you or your wife ever have any other proceeding in any court relating to your marriage or any separation between you?
"A. No, sir.
"Q. Has there ever been any suit by you or her regarding your marriage or separation?
"A. No, sir."
The master filed a supplemental report…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mutual Life Insurnace v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Greenberg v. GreenbergNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
- Van Cleaf v. . BurnsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Rudin v. RudinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
- Kaufman v. JurczakNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Martin v. MartinSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- Pierson v. PiersonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
- Malouf v. MaloufWyoming Supreme Court · 1939
- Hofman v. HofmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
- Foster v. Foster, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Beaver County1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.