Legal Opinion

Sorg v. Tower

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 30, 1935PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The facts are stipulated as follows: May 30th, 1911, James L. Tower died seized of the premises described in the bill of complaint, leaving him surviving his widow and two children, Emma J. Van Gieson and Henry Bailey Tower. By his will duly probated, the decedent gave said property to his two children absolutely, subject to his wife's use during widowhood. After his widow's death a dispute arose between his daughter and son over their interests in the property and in July. 1931. they brought suits in this court, each against the other. Mrs. Van Gieson's suit was for partition and Tower's…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Haughwout & Pomeroy v. MurphySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1871
  2. Hart v. LeonardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1886
  3. Hoy v. BramhallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1868
  4. Majewski v. GreenbergNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  5. Raritan Water Power Co. v. VeghteSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1869

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Finley v. KeeneNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945
  2. Barry, Inc. v. Baf, LimitedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  3. Beth Hamedresh Hagadol v. IssermanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API