Legal Opinion

Monolith Portland Midwest Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided January 22, 1951No. Civ. No. 11816PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES M. CARTER, District Judge.

This’ case concerns the War Mobilization and Reconversion Act of 1944, Act of Oct. 3, 1944, c. 480, 58 Stat. 785, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, §§ 1651 to 1678, hereafter referred to as the Reconversion Act and the Contract Settlement Act of 1944, Act of July 1, 1944, c. 358, 58 Stat. 649, 41 U.S. C.A. §§ 101-125, hereafter referred to as the Settlement Act and the rights of a contracting party (plaintiff) whose contract with the defendant, Reconstruction Finance Corporation, was allegedly terminated under the above Acts. A previous case by the same plaintiff against…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Lichter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v. HirschSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Hollerbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Priebe & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Monolith Portland Midwest Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1955
  2. Monolith Portland Midwest Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API