Armstrong v. Ewing
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
“The determination of whether a family offense was committed is a factual issue to be resolved by the hearing court” (Matter of Creighton v Whitmore, 71 AD3d 1141 [2010]; see Matter of Greener v Greener, 77 AD3d 664 [2010]; Matter of Kaur v Singh, 73 AD3d 1178 [2010]), and where that court is presented with issues of credibility, its findings are accorded great weight on appeal (see Matter of Greener v Greener, 77 AD3d 664 [2010]; Matter of Kaur v Singh, 73 AD3d 1178 [2010]; Matter of Ciccone *1093v Ciccone, 73 AD3d 1052 [2010]). Contrary to the appellant’s contention, a fair preponderance of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Creighton v. WhitmoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Kaur v. SinghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Gray v. GrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re Monay W.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Sinclair v. Batista-MallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Clarke-Golding v. GoldingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Cruz v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Callahan v. FiccianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Callahan v. FiccianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Clarke-Golding v. GoldingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.