Clarke-Golding v. Golding
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
“The determination of whether a family offense was committed is a factual issue to be resolved by the hearing court” (Mat*1118ter of Creighton v Whitmore, 71 AD3d 1141, 1141 [2010]; see Family Ct Act §§ 812, 832; Matter of Armstrong v Ewing, 82 AD3d 1092 [2011]; Matter of Kaur v Singh, 73 AD3d 1178 [2010]), “and that court’s determination regarding the credibility of witnesses is entitled to great weight on appeal unless clearly unsupported by the record” (Matter of Creighton v Whitmore, 71 AD3d at 1141; see Matter of Kaur v Singh, 73 AD3d at 1178).
Here, a fair preponderance of the credible…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Creighton v. WhitmoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Kaur v. SinghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Gray v. GrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Drury v. DruryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Ford v. PittsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Winfield v. GammonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Kondor v. KondorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Konstatine v. KonstatineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Matter of Masciello v. MascielloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Cabeza v. CabezaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.