Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Dodd v. Joseph

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1992No. SC S39163PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraber, J.

In this mandamus proceeding, we consider whether the Court of Appeals must vacate its order dismissing the cross-petition for judicial review filed in that court by rela-tors. We conclude that the Court of Appeals must vacate its order of dismissal, and we direct that a writ issue accordingly.

Relators are persons whose property is affected by a final order of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA). Rela-tors filed a petition for judicial review of the LUBA order, but it was untimely. Accordingly, the Court of Appeals dismissed that petition for judicial review. Relators do not challenge that…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dodd v. Hood River CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. Jaqua v. City of SpringfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. Friends of the Hood River Waterfront v. City of Hood RiverCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API