Hooper v. Young
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco granting a new trial. J. M. S.eawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Titus & Creed, and A. M. Kidd, for C. A. Hooper, Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
This is an appeal from an order granting defendants a new trial. "
The action is in ejectment for the recovery of a tract of land containing about forty acres, situated in the city and county of San Francisco. The original plaintiffs were C. A. Hooper and T. M. Osmont, but Osmont having died since the trial the other plaintiffs were substituted. Defendant Young is simply a tenant of defendant Webber.
This is the second appeal in this case. Upon the first appeal plaintiffs claimed title under a patent to one Wagner, which was held void, while defendants claimed title under a patent to one…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Love v. WatkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Whittier v. StegeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Woodard v. HenneganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Hooper v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by3 opinions
- Georgia State Board of Examiners in Optometry v. Friedmans' Jewelers Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Wayne v. Murphey-Favre & Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1936
- Hughes v. KorntvedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933