Legal Opinion
State v. Canfield
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided March 18, 2004No. 21749-3-IIIPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
86 P.3d 806 (2004)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Michael Christopher CANFIELD, Appellant.
No. 21749-3-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Four.
March 18, 2004.
Janet G. Gemberling, Attorney at Law, Spokane, WA, for Appellant.
John D. Knodell, Teresa J. Chen, Grant County Prosecutor's Office, Ephrata, WA, for Respondent.
SCHULTHEIS, J.
An offender facing revocation of a suspended sentence under the Special Sex Offender Sentencing Alternative (SSOSA) is entitled to the right of allocution. State v. Beer, 93 Wash.App. 539, 546, 969 P.2d 506 (1999). Because Mr. Canfield was not…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Escoe v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- State v. MadisonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
- State v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. SimsWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. SimsWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. CanfieldWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. CanfieldWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. ParteeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.