Hamilton v. City of Cambridge
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
The case was submitted on briefs.
1Opinion of the CourtDe Courcy, J.
The alleged defect was in the sidewalk of Massa-
chusetts Avenue in Cambridge, near a city water shut-off. There was testimony that two bricks were broken in halves, making a V shaped depression- two or three inches deep and six or eight inches long. It did not appear how this condition was caused, or how long before the accident it had existed. The trial judge * directed a verdict for the defendant, on the ground that there was no evidence to show that the city “had or by the exercise of proper care and diligence might have had reasonable notice of the defect.” The correctness of this ruling…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Brooks v. Inhabitants of SomervilleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
3Cited by5 opinions
- Duffy v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Cook v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Beaumier v. Town of HeathMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Taylor v. Inhabitants of SterlingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Andrew Dutton Co. v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919