Legal Opinion
Duffy v. City of Boston
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 26, 1931PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
The plaintiff received a personal injury while walking along the sidewalk on Tremont Street, a public way in the defendant city. It is admitted by the defendant that due notice of the time, place and cause of the accident was seasonably given to the defendant.
*14The plaintiff testified, in substance, that she was accompanied by another woman and when opposite the building numbered 175 on Tremont Street the sidewalk came to an end and there was a curbstone, then a driveway leading into the rear of the building, then a curb, and the sidewalk continued; that as she came to the place where she was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Naze v. Inhabitants of HudsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- George v. City of MaldenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Hamlet v. Inhabitants of WatertownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Murphy v. City of SomervilleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Sheehan v. City of LynnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Callagy v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Sylvia v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Clohecy v. City of HaverhillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Green v. Town of WilmingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Becker v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.