Legal Opinion

Shields v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 11, 1927No. 3512PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

In the court below, Daniel J. Shields, Milan Dick-lick, Julius Rothstein, William Holzmann, and a number of other persons were jointly indicted for violation of the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. § 10138Í4 et seq.).' Before the trial, Dieklick pleaded nolo contendere and was sentenced. See Hudson v. United States (C. C. A.) 9 F.(2d) 825; Id., 47 S. Ct. 127, 71 L. Ed.-. Subsequently Rothstein, Holzmann, Shields, and sundry other defendants went to trial, and, confining our attention to his case, Shields was found guilty, was sentenced, and thereafter sued out…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crawford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Simpson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  4. Hudson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1925

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. DailCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Outlaw v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
  3. United States v. StoehrDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. John E. Smith's Sons Co. v. Lattimer Foundry & Machine Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. United States v. AlaimoDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API