Legal Opinion
John E. Smith's Sons Co. v. Lattimer Foundry & Machine Co.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 30, 1956No. 4493PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN W. MURPHY, Chief Judge.
In this diversity action, after a contested trial upon the merits, the jury on June 1 returned a verdict of $8,000 for the plaintiff. Judgment was entered forthwith by the Clerk.1 June 5 defendant filed a motion for a new trial.2 June 8 defendant’s counsel ex parte and without notice to plaintiff’s counsel asked and was granted permission to assign additional reasons upon receipt of a copy of the transcript of testimony, provided a copy of the transcript was ordered. June 14 plaintiff’s counsel forwarded an exemplified copy of the judgment to plaintiff and advised…
2Cases cited101 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Quercia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- John E. Smith's Sons Company v. Lattimer Foundry & MacHine CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- John H. Cromling v. The Pittsburgh and Lake Erie R.R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc. v. Hughes Aircraft Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1976
- Preform Building Components, Inc. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1971
- Beech Aircraft Corp. v. Flexible Tubing Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1967
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.