Legal Opinion

State v. Almos

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 18, 1913No. Nos. 18,177—(14)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Defendant was indicted by the grand jury of Polk county for the crime of grand larceny in the first degree, was tried in the district court for that county before Watts, J., and a jury which found defendant guilty as charged in the indictment. From an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial, he appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.

Defendant was convicted of the crime of grand larceny in the first degree, on the charge of having stolen $5.75 from the person of one Rudolph Zeiske. Defendant is 23 years old, was brought up on a farm in Norway and had been in this country two and one-half years. Since coming here he has worked on farms and in the woods. On October 10, 1912, he came to East Grand Forks with one Nelson, and for three days spent most of his time about the saloons. It is conceded that on the evening of Saturday, October 12, after closing time, and at about 11:20 p. m. he came to Engen’s saloon, where he had a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. YatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. State v. HoySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. OrecchioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  2. State v. HuntSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  3. Governing Board v. PannillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  4. State v. DolliverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  5. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API