Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Jakupko
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided November 17, 2006No. 29A02-0603-CV-207PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company ("State Farm") appeals from the trial court's entry of summary judgment for Patricia Jakupko, Nicholas Jakupko, and Matthew Jakupko (collectively "the Jakupkos") on their claims for underinsured motorist coverage ("UIM"). State Farm contends that coverage under its policy for the Jakupkos' three negligent infliction of emotional distress claims is confined to a single "Each Person" limit of liability. In a declaratory judgment, the trial court concluded that the relevant policy provisions violate the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Voorhees v. Preferred Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Cullison v. MedleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Shuamber v. HendersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Dunn v. Meridian Mutual Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Crabtree v. State Farm Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hansen v. Board of Trustees of Hamilton Southeastern School Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. DowdyAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. JakupkoIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Indiana Patient's Compensation Fund v. WinkleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. D.L.B. Ex Rel. BrakeIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.