Legal Opinion

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Dugan

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 2007No. 2006-2335PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} This court admitted respondent, Vincent A. Dugan Jr. of Columbus, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0025982, to the practice of law in Ohio in 1983. The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline now recommends that we publicly reprimand respondent for violating Gov.Bar R. V(8)(G)(1) (requiring a lawyer who employs a lawyer with a suspended license to register the employment with Disciplinary Counsel), 2-101(A)(l) (prohibiting a lawyer from publicizing the lawyer’s services with false, misleading, or self-laudatory statements), and 2-101(A)(5) (prohibiting a lawyer from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2004

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Board of Professional Responsibility v. ReguliTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Mezher and EspohlOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Brand (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Columbus Bar Assn. v. Bahan (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Mezher and EspohlOhio Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API