Legal Opinion
Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Mezher and Espohl
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 3, 2012No. 2012-0684PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.
{¶ 1} Respondent, Kathleen D. Mezher of Cincinnati, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0016982, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1984. Respondent, Frank Eric Espohl of Cincinnati, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0065957, was admitted to the Ohio bar in 1996. Mezher and Espohl practice together in the Law Offices of Kathleen Mezher & Associates, L.L.C. (“Mezher & Associates”).
{¶ 2} On December 12, 2011, relator, the Cincinnati Bar Association, filed an amended complaint with the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline. The complaint alleged that Mezher and Espohl had…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. ReidOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. ClearyOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Findlay/Hancock County Bar Ass'n v. FilkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Disciplinary Counsel v. ShaneOhio Supreme Court · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. RanzyOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Mezher and EspohlOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Lorain Cty. Bar Assn. v. Berta (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021