Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Mezher and Espohl

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 2012No. 2012-0684Published

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Mezher and Espohl, 134 Ohio St.3d 319,

2012-Ohio-5527.] CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. MEZHER AND ESPOHL. [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Mezher and Espohl, 134 Ohio St.3d 319,

2012-Ohio-5527.] Attorneys—Misconduct—Failure to communicate basis of a fee and misleading communication regarding fee—Public reprimand. (No. 2012-0684—Submitted August 22, 2012—Decided December 3, 2012.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 11-078. __________________ LANZINGER, J. {¶ 1} Respondent, Kathleen D. Mezher of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. ReidOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. ClearyOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Findlay/Hancock County Bar Ass'n v. FilkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. ShaneOhio Supreme Court · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API