Legal Opinion

Smith v. Mark Dodge, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 20, 2006No. 1040975PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

W. Bruce Smith appeals from an order of the Mobile Circuit Court granting motions to compel arbitration filed by Mark Dodge, Inc., and DaimlerChrysler Corporation. We affirm.

Facts and Procedural History

On July 21, 2003, Smith purchased from Mark Dodge a used 2001 Dodge Ram truck, which had been manufactured by DaimlerChrysler. The vehicle was accompanied by a warranty issued by DaimlerChrysler. Smith also received a service contract, declaring itself to be…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Sunkist Soft Drinks, Inc., Del Monte Corporation, Nabisco Brands, Inc. v. Sunkist Growers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Hollis v. City of BrightonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  2. Machado v. System4 LLCMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  3. CitiFinancial Corp., LLC v. PeoplesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  4. Pavilion Development v. Jbj PartnershipSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  5. Special Assets, LLC v. Chase Home Finance, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API