Legal Opinion

In Re Capital Cities/abc, Inc.'s Application for Access to Sealed Transcripts. Appeal of Capital Cities/abc, Inc

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 23, 1990No. 90-5039PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

HUTCHINSON, Circuit Judge.

Capital Cities/ABC, Inc. (Capital Cities) appeals from a final order of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania denying its application for access to three sealed documents. The documents, two transcripts of chambers and sidebar conferences during a criminal trial and the stenographer’s notes of those conferences, concern the involvement of one of the witnesses at trial in an on-going federal grand jury investigation unrelated to the matter about which he testified. They were among sealed portions of the record…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Mary Burton v. Teleflex IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  2. ACUMED LLC v. Advanced Surgical Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  3. Sigler v. American Honda Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  4. Webb v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API