Legal Opinion

State v. Sampson

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided January 9, 1995No. 2286PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In this criminal case, the State charged all three defendants with “aiding, abetting and assisting one another” in the simple possession of marijuana and crack cocaine, and possession with intent to distribute (PWID) marijuana and crack cocaine. Warren Sampson and Pacquilla Sampson are married; Sir Jeffrey Scott Carroll is Mr. Sampson’s son. The jury convicted Carroll and Mr. Sampson on all four charges. It convicted Mrs. Sampson on the simple possession charges only. All three defendants appeal separately. The only common issue is a challenge to the affidavit underlying the search warrant.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  5. State v. CreechCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  2. Rhoad v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  3. State v. FaireyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  4. State v. FreyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  5. State v. CliffordCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API