Legal Opinion
State v. Frey
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided January 25, 2005No. 3878PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
The State has petitioned for a rehearing and argues our prior opinion was incorrect in several particulars. While we deny the petition for rehearing, we briefly address the State’s contentions.
The State argues initially that the record establishes its compliance with the statutory mandate requiring that “[bjlood and urine samples must be obtained by physicians licensed by the State Board of Medical Examiners, registered nurses licensed by the State Board of Nursing, and other medical personnel trained to obtain the samples in a licensed medical facility.” S.C.Code Ann. § 56-5-2950(a)…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. MorganCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
- State v. ChandlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Elledge v. Richland/Lexington School District FiveSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- State v. HuntleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Peake v. South Carolina Department of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
- Edwards v. State Law Enforcement DivisionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- Sanders v. SCDMVSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2020
- State v. Tammy Dianne BrownCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2022