Legal Opinion
Osbourne v. Capital City Mortgage Corp.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 1, 1999No. 96-CV-1987PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellants come before this court for the second time alleging, inter alia, breach of contract and misrepresentation on the part of their mortgage company, Capital City Mortgage, Inc. (Capital City). In Osbourne v. Capital City Mortgage Corp., (Osbourne I), 667 A.2d 1321 (D.C.1995), we reversed a grant of summary judgment against appellants and reinstated their four-count complaint claiming (1) breach of contract; (2) breach of obligation to release trust; (3) misrepresentation; and (4) statutory violations under D.C.Code §§ 28-3312, -3904 (1996 Repl.). 1 Now, appellants allege trial court…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Edmund J. Flynn Co. v. LaVayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Marshall v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Romer v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Bauman v. SragowDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
- Atwater v. District of Columbia Department of Consumer & Regulatory AffairsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Fort Lincoln Civic Ass'n v. Fort Lincoln New Town Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- District Cablevision Limited Partnership v. BassinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- In Re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008
- Virginia Academy of Clinical Psychologists v. Group Hospitalization & Medical Services, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.