United States ex rel. Lisitza v. Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
John J. Tharp, Jr., United States. District Judge ¡
' In this qui tam action brought primarily under the federal False Claims Act and parallel state statutes, the plaintiffs—the United States, the State of Michigan, and the State of Indiana—allege that defendant Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc., caused national pharmacy chains to submit false claims for reimbursement from Medicaid by inducing them to fill prescriptions not with the generic drugs originally prescribed but with more expensive forms and dosages of those drugs manufactured by Par. The plaintiffs…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. EscobarSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- George Jones, Cross-Appellant v. City of Chicago, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Buth v. Walmart IncDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2019
- Buth v. Walmart IncDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2021
- Graziosi v. Accretive Health, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
- JERSEY STRONG PEDIATRICS, LLC v. WANAQUE CONVALESCENT CENTERDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
- People of the State of Illinois ex rel. Byron Strakusek v. Omnicare, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.