Legal Opinion

Moors v. Sanford

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided October 9, 1895No. 23PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Memorandum. — Error from Graham district court; Charles W. Smith, judge. Action in foreclosure by-Francis J. Moors against Ephraim Sanford, Samuel N. Coder, Pauline Coder, The Guaranty Investment Company, Of Atchison, Kansas, and David M. Davis, receiver of The Guaranty Investment Company, of Atchison, Kansas. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiff brings the case here.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Garvbr, J. :

Plaintiff, alleging that he is the owner and holder of a note and mortgage executed by Ephraim Sanford and Mary E. Sanford, his wife, in favor of the Guaranty Investment Company and transferred to the -plaintiff, brought this action, seeking a personal judgment against Sanford on the note and a foreclosure of the mortgage securing the same. The *245petition was filed April 18, 1892. S. N. Coder was made a party defendant, and answered, setting up title in himself by deed of conveyance executed by Ephraim Sanford, Mary E. Sanford being dead,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clapp v. . FullertonNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  2. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. LathropSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Grant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1822
  4. Baughman v. BaughmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  5. Woodman v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Parker v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Tobin v. O'BrieterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  3. Caldwell v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
  4. Missouri Valley Lumber Co. v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1896
  5. American Savings & Loan Ass'n v. BurghardtMontana Supreme Court · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API