Legal Opinion
Tomecek v. Stimpson
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided April 3, 1975No. Patent Appeal No. 74-621PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALMOND, Senior Judge.
This is an appeal by senior party To-mecek from that portion of the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences awarding priority of invention for the subject matter of count 1 of interference No. 97,610 to junior party Stimpson. We affirm that decision.
The involved Stimpson application is serial No. 802,423, filed February 26, 1969, assigned to Chrysler Corporation. Count 1 was copied by Stimpson, along with counts 2 and 3 which are not now in issue, from the involved Tomecek patent No. 3,513,718, granted May 26, 1970, on an application serial No. 705,661, filed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- John J. Goodrich v. Arnold C. Harmsen and Burke P. Lokey, Burke P. Lokey v. Arnold C. Harmsen and John J. GoodrichCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- John O. Paivinen v. Eugene A. SandsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Hugh S. Knowles v. George C. TibbettsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Vincent J. Frilette and Paul B. Weisz v. Charles Newton Kimberlin, Jr. And Elroy Merle GladrowCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Voisinet v. CoglianeseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dsl Dynamic Sciences Limited v. Union Switch & Signal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Linkow v. LinkowCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
- Standard Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Weatherchem Corp. v. J.L. Clark, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1996