Legal Opinion
Wallman v. Suddock
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 17, 2011No. B224601PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SUZUKAWA, J.
Plaintiffs/appellants appeal the denial of their motions for summary judgment and the grant of defendants/respondents ’ motions for summary judgment. We conclude that defendants were entitled to summary judgment, and thus we affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiffs Barry Wallman, Stan Wallman, and Nancy Wallman (the Wallmans) are general partners of plaintiff Sea Val Enterprises, a general partnership that *1292owns interests in real property. Former plaintiff RTG Investments, Inc. (RTG), is a California corporation, of which Barry Wallman is a principal. Dan Wallman, not…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Bay Cities Paving & Grading, Inc. v. Lawyers' Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Foster-Gardner, Inc. v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Powerine Oil Co., Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Dore v. Arnold Worldwide, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Northern Assurance Co. of America v. Thomson Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Hartford Casualty Insurance Co. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Casa Colina, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020
- Heidingsfelder v. Ameriprise Auto & Home InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
- Northern Assurance Co. of America, Successor in Interest to Certain Liabilites of Employers Surplus Lines Ins. Co. v. Thomson Inc. k/n/a Technicolor, USA, Inc., Technicolor Inc.,/Technicolor LimitedIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.