Legal Opinion

American Automobile Insurance v. Clark

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 8, 1927No. 27,060PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This was an action by the plaintiff insurance company against defendant by whose negligence it had to pay a policy *446of insurance covering a collision of automobiles. Plaintiff’s claim was based upon its subrogation to the rights of the insured.

The material facts were these: One A. L. Richardson had a Studebaker automobile which needed some overhauling and he took it to defendant’s garage and machine shop1 for repair. One of defendant’s employees took the car out of the workshop to test it and drove it at high speed along a street and road…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brick v. National Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  2. Fowler v. ShawSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  3. State v. StocktonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hill v. Southern Kansas Stage Lines Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  2. Audubon Ins. Co. v. FarrSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  3. Quinton v. KendallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  4. Sawtelle v. Cosden Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  5. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API