Legal Opinion
Sevits v. McKiernan-Terry Corporation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 2, 1966No. 65 Civ. 1804PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CANNELLA, District Judge.
Motion by the defendants McKiernan-Terry Corporation (Delaware) and Rad-com Division of Litton Industries, Inc., pursuant to Rules 12(b) and 17(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to dismiss the complaint, as amended, and quash the service of process as to said defendants on the grounds that said defendants are non-existent and cannot be sued in this action, and because attempted service of process upon these non-existing corporations was ineffectual, is granted.
Motion by defendants McKiernan-Ter-ry Corporation (Delaware), Radcom Division of Litton Industries,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. Borden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Departamento de Asuntos del Consumidor v. Alturas de Florida Development Corp.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1993
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1982
- C. C. Sanderlin v. Old Dominion Stevedoring CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
- Beals v. Washington International, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1978
- Schaeffer v. Michigan-Ohio Navigation Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.