Legal Opinion
State v. Dominguez
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided July 23, 2002No. 26791PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LANSING, Judge.
Melquíades Dominguez appeals from the denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized during a warrantless search.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Dominguez was charged with possession of a controlled substance, Idaho Code § 37-2732(c), after police officers found a small bindle of methamphetamine in his wallet during a traffic stop. Dominguez moved to suppress the evidence as fruit of an illegal warrantless search. The following facts are drawn from the evidence presented at the suppression hearing.
Officers Norman Carter and Jason Bruner of the Boise Police Department stopped a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. JaborraIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. GarciaIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. Dustin Thomas ArmstrongIdaho Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. TurekIdaho Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. Kenneth Randall SmithIdaho Court of Appeals · 2015
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.