Legal Opinion

Albert v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 25, 1932No. 12,967PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

Plaintiees in error were convicted of aggravated robbery in the district court of Pueblo county and sentenced to the penitentiary. They seek a supersedeas and reversal, claiming that the information is insufficient because it fails to allege ownership of the money taken from the complaining witness.

The information charges: “That Charles Albert, alias Joseph Lewis Brownie, Mann Brewer, Andrew Sando and another person whose name is, to the District Attorney, unknown, on or about the 16th day of May, A. D. 1931, at the County of Pueblo, State of Colorado, being then and there armed with…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Imboden v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  2. Koontz v. the PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  3. Sarno v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  4. Tracy v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
  5. Dougherty v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1872

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wright v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  2. Critchfield v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
  3. Hampton v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  4. Arnett v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
  5. Border Chicken AZ LLC v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API