Legal Opinion
Gross v. Pfizer, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided January 27, 2012No. 8:10-mj-00110PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ALEXANDER WILLIAMS, JR., District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant Pliva USA, Inc. (“PLIVA”)’s motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Doc. No. 83. The Court has reviewed the motions and all supporting documents and finds no hearing is necessary. See Md. Loe. R. 105.6 (D. Md. 2010). For the reasons articulated below, the Court grants Defendant’s motion.
I. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff filed this action as a result of injuries she suffered from ingesting the prescription drug metoclopramide.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Pacific Insurance Company v. American National Fire Insurance Company, Rail Link, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Moore ex rel. Frazier v. Mylan Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2012
- Phelps v. Wyeth, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2013
- Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Metz v. Wyeth, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2012
- Frazier v. Mylan Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.