Edgell v. Canning
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HOWE, Chief Justice:
¶ 1 Plaintiffs Daniel Edgell and Lanae Edgell appeal from an adverse judgment. They brought this action against defendants Celeste Canning and Mark Hammon to determine the location of the boundary between their adjoining subdivision lots. Defendants cross-appeal from that part of the judgment which awarded plaintiffs an easement over part of defendants’ lot where plaintiffs’ cabin encroaches.
¶2 Plaintiffs are the owners of lot 248, Evergreen Park Subdivision in Weber County. Defendants are the owners of lot 249, which lies immediately west of lot 248. The east boundary of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lunt v. KitchensUtah Supreme Court · 1953
- Marchant v. Park CityUtah Supreme Court · 1990
- Wade v. StanglCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
- Arnold v. HansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Smith v. DeNiroUtah Supreme Court · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ault v. HoldenUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Gillmor v. Family Link, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- Johnson v. HigleyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999
- Nyman v. Anchor Development, L.L.C.Utah Supreme Court · 2003
- Judd v. BowenUtah Supreme Court · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.