Legal Opinion

Stone v. Cheverly Police Department

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 31, 2016No. 2526/14PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDeborah S. Eyler, J.

The Cheverly Police Department (“CPD”) and Police Chief Harold “Buddy” Robshaw (collectively “the Town”), 1 the appellee, brought disciplinary charges against Corporal Earl Stone and Corporal Edmund Gizinski, 2 the appellants, pursuant to the Law Enforcement Officers’ Bill of Rights (“the LEOBR”), Md.Code (2003, 2011 RepLVol., 2015 Supp.), section 3-101 through 3-113 of the Public Safety Article (“PS”). 3 The Officers elected to be tried by a hearing board. Before the trial commenced, they filed suit in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, pursuant to section 3-105, seeking an order…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. DiGrazia v. COUNTY EXEC. FOR MONT. CTY.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  2. Soley v. State Commission on Human RelationsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  3. Blondell v. Baltimore City Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  4. Montgomery County v. Broadcast Equities, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  5. Welsh v. Gerber Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Manger v. Fraternal Order of Police, Montgomery Cnty. Lodge 35, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API