McNeal v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtHarrell, J.
This case beckons us to examine our opinion in Price v. State, 405 Md. 10, 949 A.2d 619 (2008), in which we broke with the majority of jurisdictions nationwide and our own jurisprudence to conclude clearly that legally inconsistent jury verdicts in criminal cases were prohibited henceforth in Maryland. The concurring opinion in Price went to some lengths to explain that the scope of the Court’s opinion should be read to extend only to legally inconsistent jury verdicts, but not to factually inconsistent jury verdicts. 405 Md. at 35, 949 A.2d at 634 (Harrell, J., concurring). A legally…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- People v. TuckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Sealfon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- State of Tennessee v. Marlo DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
- Givens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- Teixeira v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Travis v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Brice v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.