Legal Opinion

United States v. Leonard Ray Blanton, Clyde Edward Hood, Jr. And James M. Allen

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 10, 1983No. 82-5091PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants appeal the district court’s order denying their request that it certify that it is inclined to grant their motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. We conclude that the district court’s order denying certification of an inclination to grant that motion for a new trial is an unappealable order.

Defendants moved for a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 33. The notices of appeal from the judgments of conviction had already been filed, so the district court did not have power to grant the motion absent a remand. Fed.R.Crim.P.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. First National Bank of Salem, Ohio v. Harry D. HirschCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
  3. United States v. Lester Clifford LeeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
  4. United States v. Robert A. Frame, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  5. United States v. Fuentes-LozanoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Harry Christian (84-5843), Joe L. Davis (85-5005/85-5346)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  2. United States v. Richard Lee HatfieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  3. Government of the Virgin Islands v. Jose Lima, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  4. United States v. Leonard Ray Blanton (81-5644), Clyde Edward Hood, Jr. (81-5645), James M. Allen (81-5643)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  5. Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API