Jackson v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
WILNER, Judge.
The issue before us is whether the Circuit Court for Baltimore County erred in denying petitioner’s motion for new trial, based on newly discovered evidence. Petitioner’s complaint is not that the motion should have been granted, but that it should not have been denied without a hearing. At our request, she and the State have also addressed the question of whether the court was authorized to act on the motion while her appeal from the judgment of conviction was pending in the Court of Special Appeals. We find merit in the issue she raised, but none in the issue we raised.…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Henry James Wright, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Paul O'DellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Pulley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- United States v. James A. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- General Motors Corp. v. SeayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Douglas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Cottman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Baker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.