Watts v. Brewer
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBaeNhill, C. J.
The defendant’s exceptions and assignments of error are not directed to the findings of fact made by the Commission. Worsley v. Rendering Co., 239 N.C. 547, 80 S.E. 2d 467. They do, however, challenge the correctness of the allowance of compensation for partial loss of vision of the eye after the claimant returned to work for the same employer at the same salary, that is, after the healing period. Defendant stressfully contends that the award in this respect is unwarranted and contrary to the express provisions of the Act; that the Act provides compensation for loss of wages; and that after…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Northwestern Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Branham v. Denny Roll & Panel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Douglas v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- Worsley v. S. &. W. Rendering Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Rice v. . Panel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Peoples v. Cone Mills Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Whitley v. Columbia Lumber Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Little v. Anson County Schools Food ServiceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Knight v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Perry v. Hibriten Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.