Bowles v. Electromatic Distributors, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MANDELBAUM, District Judge.
This is a suit by the Office of Price Administration for an injunction and for treble damages. The corporate defendant, by its answer, has interposed six defenses and two counterclaims. The individual defendants have answered separately and have set up eleven defenses and one counterclaim.
The plaintiff moves to strike out the first, fourth and fifth defenses of all the defendants (these are identical in both answers), the seventh, ninth, tenth and eleventh defenses interposed by the individual defendants, and all the counterclaims of all the defendants.
As to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Nassau Smelting & Refining Works, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Bowles v. Indianapolis Glove Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
- Bowles v. CrewDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1945
3Cited by2 opinions
- Porter v. SenderowitzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
- Mitchell v. Floyd Pappin & Son, Inc.District Court, D. Montana · 1954