Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. Floyd Pappin & Son, Inc.
District Court, D. Montana
Decided April 19, 1954No. 1487PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRAY, Chief Judge.
The question before the court in the above entitled cause at this time is on the motion by plaintiff for the dismissal of. defendant’s counterclaim, which was submitted on briefs filed by counsel for the respective parties.
This action was brought by the plaintiff, Martin P. Durkin, Secretary of *756Labor, United States Department of Labor, on April 9, 1953, to recover from the defendant unpaid overtime compensation alleged to be due its employee, Vernon J. Gleason, under the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, herein referred to as the Act.
It appears…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Walling v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- McComb v. Frank Scerbo & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Walling v. Norfolk Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Mooney Aircraft, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Wirtz v. C & P Shoe Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Robert De Mario Jewelry, Inc. And Robert Demario, an Individual, Robert De Mario Jewelry, Inc. And Robert Demario, an Individual, Cross-Appellant v. James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. C & P Shoe Corporation, C & P Shoe Corporation v. W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Mitchell v. Robert De Mario Jewelry, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.