Legal Opinion

Board of Commissioners v. City Commissioners

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 25, 2012No. A12A0209PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dillard, Judge.

The Board of Commissioners of Crisp County (“the Count’’) appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to the City Commissioners of Cordele (“the City’’) and the denial of the County’s motion for summary judgment as to a contract dispute between the parties. The County essentially argues that the trial court erred by using parol evidence to construe an unambiguous contract rather than by looking to the document’s plain meaning, thereby rewriting the terms of the contract. For the reasons set forth infra, we affirm the trial court’s order.

At the outset, we note that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. ALEA London Limited v. WoodcockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  2. Holcim (US), Inc. v. AMDG, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  3. Little v. Fleet FinanceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  4. Southern General Insurance v. Wellstar Health Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  5. Payne v. Middlesex InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. UWork.Com, Inc. v. Paragon Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  2. Monitronics International, Inc. v. VeasleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  3. Garrett v. Southern Health Corp. of Ellijay, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  4. Vanessa Anderson v. Wilco Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
  5. Ace American Insurance Company v. The Wattles CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API