ALEA London Limited v. Woodcock
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
MlKELL, Judge.
In this appeal and cross-appeal, we affirm a judgment entered in favor of Ray Woodcock, individually and d/b/a Mulligan’s Bar and Grill (“the bar”), and Bruce L. Stanfield, in Alea London Limited’s declaratory judgment action. The case hinges on the proper interpretation of the assault and battery exclusion in Alea’s commercial general liability (“CGL”) insurance policy. Although we disapprove of the trial court’s decision to submit the question of contract construction to the jury, the jury properly determined that coverage existed for the incident in question, and the judgment…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United Services Automobile Ass'n v. DareAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Board of Regents of University System v. A. B. & E., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Jefferson Insurance Co. of New York v. DunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Colonial Oil Industries v. Underwriters Subscribing to Policy Numbers TO31504670 & TO31504671Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Board of Commissioners v. City CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- American Strategic Insurance v. HelmCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Georgia Department of Transportation v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Landmark American Insurance Co. v. KhanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Renee Unlimited, Inc. v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.