In Re Ginsburg
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
What is in question here is whether the district judge was right in denying appellant’s motion to suppress the use, in evidence, of property, documents, etc. searched for, seized and taken from defendant’s apartment at the time of, and in connection with, his arrest under a warrant of arrest. Based on the Fourth 1 and Fifth Amendments, 2 this is another of those cases in which appellant and appellee, concerning themselves little with the Constitutional words, seize upon particular words in particular cases 3 to roll them as sweet morsels under their tongues. It may…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Lonnie Robert Bryant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
- United States v. KlapholzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Foxall v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.