Legal Opinion

Harris v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 26, 1945No. 3105PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Circuit Judge.

This appeal involves the reasonableness of a search and seizure, pursuant to which appellant was indicted, tried and convicted on evidence obtained by such challenged search and seizure.

In execution of two warrants for the arrest of appellant — one duly issued upon a criminal complaint alleging violation of the Mail Fraud Statute, 18 U.S.C.A. § 338, and the other for violation of the National Stolen Property Act, 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 413-419— four or five special agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation went to the apartment of appellant at 2308 North Ellison, Oklahoma…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. George Martin GolayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  3. United States v. Eugene J. Hanon, United States of America v. Gloria Meyer, United States of America v. John L. BoveriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
  4. United States v. Nicholas GuidoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
  5. Attilio Agnellino v. State of New Jersey and Howard Yeager, Principal Keeper, New Jersey State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API