Legal Opinion

In Re: Deepwater Horizon

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 10, 2014No. 13-30095PublishedCited by 179 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge:

This is an interlocutory appeal from the district court’s order certifying a class action and approving a settlement under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.1 The ongoing litigation before the district court encompasses claims against British Petroleum Exploration & Production, Inc. (“BP”) and numerous other entities. All these claims are related to the 2010 explosion aboard the Deepwater Horizon, an offshore drilling rig, and the consequent discharge of oil into the Gulf of Mexico.

Several of the original appellants in this case have moved to…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by179 opinions

  1. Vince Mullins v. Direct Digital, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  2. Crystal Byrd v. Aaron's IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  3. Neale v. Volvo Cars of North America, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  4. In Re National Football League Players Concussion Injury LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  5. AstraZeneca AB v. United Food & Commercial Workers UnionsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015

174 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API