Legal Opinion

Parsil v. Emery

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 15, 1934PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment dismissing complaint reversed upon the law and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. The agreement sued upon must be read as a whole. The sale of the stock by the defendant to the plaintiff was by way of inducement to the plaintiff to enter 'into the contract of employment. Such *654reservation of conditional title as the defendant could claim was dependent wholly upon plaintiff’s faithful performance of the contract of employment. The clause in the contract relating to the termination of the employment prior to December 31, 1929, “ for any cause,” must, in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. Globe Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Vogel v. Paths Exchange, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wilson Sullivan Co. v. International Paper Makers Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Hudak v. Hornell Industries, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Carter v. BradleeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  4. Battipaglia v. Executive Committee of the Democratic County CommitteeNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Cycleway, Inc. v. Kawasaki Motors Corp., U. S. A.New York Supreme Court · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API