Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Fidelity National Bank & Trust Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 15, 1937PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appellant, a surety company, will be called plaintiff herein and respondent, a bank, will be called defendant. Plaintiff had executed a surety bond in favor of the Continental Construction Company, herein called Continental, promising, for a consideration, to indemnify it against loss by reason of the dishonesty of its employees. The amount of the surety coverage was $100,000, and among the employees whose dishonesty was insured against was one Chaney, a pay-roll clerk. It was the custom and duty of the field foreman on the job to compile, semimonthly, a list of the names of field employees,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Johnson-Brinkman Commission Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  2. Aloe v. Fidelity Mutual Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  3. Midland Savings & Loan Co. v. Tradesmen's Nat. Bank of Oklahoma CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  4. Ralston Purina Co. v. KingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1937
  5. Union Biscuit Co. v. Springfield Grocer Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Twellman v. Lindell Trust Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Davis v. HauschildSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  4. Newco Land Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  5. King v. GuyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API