Legal Opinion
Lorenz v. New Hampshire Administrative Office of the Courts
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided September 30, 2004No. 2004-552PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*441MEMORANDUM OPINION
2Per curiam
The petitioners are court stenographers who seek a
declaration that the respondents, the New Hampshire Administrative Office of the Courts and the New Hampshire Supreme Court, are equitably estopped from firing them except for good cause based only upon poor job performance or misconduct. They have moved to recuse all current and retired supreme court justices who participated in issuing Administrative Order 2004-02, which initiated the process of terminating the petitioners’ employment.
The petitioners assert that disqualification is required because: (1) they challenge an…
3Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. WillSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Capital Telephone Co. v. Pattersonville Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Cheney v. United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. BaderSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- Douglas v. DouglasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Stonecipher v. Poplar Bluff R1 School DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC v. Roche Diagnostics GMBHSupreme Court of Delaware · 2021
- State v. A.M.W.Washington Supreme Court · 2025