Legal Opinion
Capital Telephone Co. v. Pattersonville Telephone Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 13, 1982PublishedCited by 132 opinions
POINTS OF COUNSEL
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Meyer, J.
Plaintiffs’ complaint in this action brought under the provisions of the Donnelly Act (General Business Law, §§ 340-347) alleging violation by defendants and New York Telephone Company (NYT) of the antitrust proscriptions of that act is not precluded by the Public Service Commission’s prior dismissal of plaintiffs’ complaint to that body pursuant to section 91 of the Public Service Law alleging discriminatory activity by the New York Telephone Company. There having been no hearing before the commission (PSC) and the issues to be determined in the Donnelly Act…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Far East Conference v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Schwartz v. Public AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by132 opinions
- Cullen v. MargiottaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Kenneth S. Cameron v. Matthew Fogarty and John HalbigCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Staatsburg Water Co. v. Staatsburg Fire DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Liss v. Trans Auto Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Flacke v. Onondaga Landfill Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.