Legal Opinion

Rosenzweig v. Larkin

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided April 6, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonnelly, J.

An order for a bill of particulars of a defense of payment will not be granted unless very special circumstances appear. (Yangtsze Ins. Assn. v. Stark, 195 App. Div. 401.) At bar such special circumstances exist which require the granting of plaintiff’s motion, at least to the extent herein indicated. The action is to recover from the defendant the reasonable value of legal services rendered by the plaintiff, an attorney, to and for the *106defendant at the latter’s request. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff and one Joshua Egelson were copartners, practicing law under the firm name and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gormly v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  2. Sittig v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  3. Yangtsze Insurance v. Stark & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Peck v. Bandell, New York County Courts1937
  2. Runals v. Niagara UniversityNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Thompson v. ShevlinNew York Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API